_ Poetry in the Arts
“Do you know my poetry”
– Johnny Depp as William Blake, in Jim Jarmusch’s Dead Man
Many posts in this series were originally written for a screen writing website I belonged to, and I’d planned to eventually gather them together into a published book. As you can see, the topic got out of hand. I concentrated too much on examples from the visual arts for it to be palatable, or even comprehensible, for an audience of screenwriters. This might have been predicted. I’m illiterate and don’t know how to read — but I natively love pictures.
Still, though, I think the basic ideas presented here are good ones. We often feel, and say, that a painting, a movie, or a piece of music is “poetic,” just as much as poetry itself can be. I hope the theories I propose form a fertile way to think about this common aspect of several arts. I hope my amateur, impudent analyses, comments, flippancies, and ironies will be found amusing or even helpful to a generally literate public — not at all limited to specialists, but perhaps including people.
So, for the time being, I’m reposting, rewriting, and expanding these essays because I believe the material is good and I’d like, somewhere in medias res, to figure out how to focus and organize it. (This blog’s usual warning applies: please expect entries to be revised after posting. That’s the whole reason I’m putting them here.)
Meanwhile, it is fondly imagined that people will enjoy.
The posts in the series, published or planned, are:
- Poetry in Film, in Art
- What “poetry” means: Rembrandt
- Malevich and Vermeer
- Édouard Manet — clothed and unclothed
- The battle of the statues in Wyman Park
- Emily Dickinson — I could not stop for death
- . . . every thing would appear to man as it is, infinite
- Jane Austen — free indirect speech
- I’ll swim that minefield when I come to it
- Basho — in Kyoto
- John Brahm’s The Lodger
- . . . (more that I haven’t figured out yet) . . .
You may also be interested in the following:
- Story Structure (series)
- Dynamic Screenwriting
I see no reason to segregate scientific and technical posts from humanistic ones. In my life, scientific concerns mix with ethical ones, and they shade into a philosophical interest in the nature of cognition and the nature of people. Doing science is as creative as writing fiction, and I get inspiration for both from the same gods.
You will find little here on current politics. I'm activist, but in causes not symptoms. Experience in martial arts shows me that the sure way to lose is reactivity; but if you stay cool and remember your training and what you're there for then you achieve goals and, when conflict is unavoidable, you fight and win. The idea of the liberal arts I was brought up in is that broad understanding of cultures and ideas gives you deeper, better goals -- making success more likely and more satisfying. Negatively, the hysteria since 9/11 shows how a country frightened and reactive can destroy itself more than an enemy can. I'm trying to contribute by changing the terms of discourse. See 
One fact shouldn't require special mention; but -- given the nature of the society in which I've grown up and lived -- it often does: namely that I'm gay. You'll see it in some posts and in some links below. I'm proud of being gay and do not hide; more about this on the 
